Presentation 1
Topic ### Heading
(1 page, double spaced typed answer)
2. Serious evaluation of the presentation covering:
a) The theological perspective taken by the
presentor
insert your answer here.
b) The accuracy of the presentor's reading
of the NT document being covered.
insert your answer here.
c) Reflections on how the presentation could
have been improved.
insert your
answer here.
Presentation 2
Topic ### Heading
(1 page, double spaced typed answer, on new
page)
1. Description of contents of the presentation,
using the presentor's handout and your notes.
insert your answer here.
2. Serious evaluation of the presentation covering:
a) The theological perspective taken by the
presentor
insert your answer here.
b) The accuracy of the presentor's reading
of the NT document being covered.
insert your answer here.
c) Reflections on how the presentation could
have been improved.
insert your
answer here.
Presentation 3
Topic ### Heading
(1/2 to 1 page, double spaced typed answer,
on new page)
1. Description of contents of the presentation,
using the presentor's handout and your notes.
insert your answer here.
2. Serious evaluation of the presentation covering:
a) The theological perspective taken by the
presentor
insert your answer here.
b) The accuracy of the presentor's reading
of the NT document being covered.
insert your answer here.
c) Reflections on how the presentation could
have been improved.
insert your
answer here.
Presentation 4
Topic ### Heading
(1 page, double spaced typed answer, on new
page)
1. Description of contents of the presentation,
using the presentor's handout and your notes.
insert your answer here.
2. Serious evaluation of the presentation covering:
a) The theological perspective taken by the
presentor
insert your answer here.
b) The accuracy of the presentor's reading
of the NT document being covered.
insert your answer here.
c) Reflections on how the presentation could
have been improved.
insert your
answer here.