The Historical-Critical Method
--Lecture Notes for Topic 2.2-
Religion 492
Last revised: 4/15/04
Explanation:
Contained below is a manuscript summarizing the class lecture(s) covering the above specified range of topics from the List of Topics for Religion 492.  Quite often hyperlinks (underlined) to sources of information etc. will be inserted in the text of the lecture. Test questions for all quizzes and exams will be derived in their entirety or in part from these lectures; see Exams in the course syllabus for details. To display the Greek text contained in this page download and install the free BSTGreek True Type fonts from Bible Study Tools.
Created by   a division of   All rights reserved©
Go directly to topic:
2.2.0
Introduction
2.2.0.1
The Situation
2.2.0.2
Emerging Methodology
2.2.0.3
Refinements
2.2.0.4
Widespread Acceptance
2.2.0.5
Questions
Bibliography
.


2.2.0 Introduction
Assigned Readings for This Topic:

Gerald Bray, "The Historical-Critical Method," Biblical Interpretation: Past and Present, pp. 221-224

Robert H. Hendrick, "Historical Criticism," A paper presented to Dr. Lorin Cranford in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the seminar New Testament Critical Methodology, New Testament 771 on Sept. 27, 1993. Located at http://cranfordville.com/HisCritBH.pdf
(pp. 2-29)

        The term 'historical criticism' can conjour up all kinds of images, especially the first time one comes across the term. Most of the images are negative in nature. And if one studies only the beginning stages of this interpretive methodology that negativism will find confirmation. With just that limited perspective in mind, the Bible student will find the strong affirmations of historical criticism by a large number of very conservative NT scholars to be rather surprising. How did an interpretive method that began by casting serious doubt on the credibility of much of the Bible wind up an essential tool for contemporary Bible scholars who approach the biblical text with deep respect for its divine nature as sacred scripture?
        The answer to this question can be found in careful examination of the history of this interpretive approach. That history has its roots in the Rennaissance that swept over Europe after the Middle Ages and that has defined the modern era for the past three to four hundred years in western society. The tool, early on an instrument for disloging ecclesastical dogmatism as a basis for state church control of society, has emerged as foundational for most every form of serious effort at making sense out of the biblical text. Theological stance, regardless of what end of the spectrum, has become mostly irrelevant to the use of this method.
        Thus the exploration of this methodology becomes essential, if we're to understand the history of the interpretation of the New Testament.
        One sidenote: Historical Criticism did not begin as a biblical interpretive tool. Rather, its beginnings were in literature and the study of ancient writings, in adddition to being a tool for historical studies of the past. Gradually, it came to be applied to biblical studies, beginning with the history of Israel in the Old Testament. Then, with time it began to be applied to the New Testament, especially generating the Quest for the Historical Jesus efforts. Eventually, it expanded into a historical approach to understanding the "then" meaning of biblical texts. The "now" meaning has remained something of a step-child to this methodology, sometimes being fully integrated as the second phase of the process and sometimes being rejected as belonging to the work of theologians rather than to biblical scholars who are to concentrate solely on the "then" meaning.
 

2.2.0.1 The Situation creating Historical Criticism
Assigned Readings for This Topic:
 

Resource Materials to also be studied:
        One can never understand the approach to biblical interpretation called Historical Criticism without first understanding the world that created it. The emerging modern Europe in the Rennaissance era rediscovered history. That is, it became fascinated with historical exploration. With the impact of Artistole's definition of truth as logical consistency upon that historical interest, the probing of the past took on substantial efforts at separating out truth from fiction. The question, What actually happened?, became the dominating question of historical investigation.
 

2.2.0.2 Emerging Methodology
Assigned Readings for This Topic:

Resource Materials to also be studied:

2.2.0.3 Refinements
Assigned Readings for This Topic:

Resource Materials to also be studied:

2.2.0.4 Widespread Acceptance
Assigned Readings for This Topic:

Resource Materials to also be studied:

2.2.0.5 Developing Questioning of the Methodology
Assigned Readings for This Topic:

Resource Materials to also be studied:
 
 



Bibliography

Check Bray's bibliography in appropriate chapter of the textbook.

Check the appropriate Bibliography section in Cranfordville.com

Hendrick, Robert H. "Historical Criticism." A paper presented to Dr. Lorin Cranford in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the seminar New Testament Critical Methodology, New Testament 771 on Sept. 27, 1993. Located at http://cranfordville.com/HisCritBH.pdf
(pp. 2-29)

"Historical Criticism," Catholic Encyclopedia online.

McCarthy, John. F. "Neo-Patristic Exegesis: Its Approach and Method. Part I. The State of the Question."  Living Tradition (No. 75, June 1998).

McCarthy, John. F. "Neo-Patristic Exegesis: Its Approach and Method. Part II. A Neo-Patristic Reply to the Historical Critical Question."  Living Tradition (No. 76, July 1998).

McCarthy, John F. "Two Views of Historical Criticism: Part I. Historical Criticism as a Critical Method." Living Tradition (No. 77, Sept. 1998).

McCarthy, John F. "Two Views of Historical Criticism: Part II. Historical Criticism as a Critical Method." Living Tradition (No. 78, Nov. 1998).

Zinke, E. Edward. "Historical Criticism." Biblical Research Institute. Sept. 1981.